Two lines of logic is no longer the main element of historical Reformed theology. I feel like the line says two things that are not in sync with each other. Reformed theology is designed to protect the gospel from being simplified or misrepresented by religious teachings. When we use the word "justification" to describe our faith, we usually mean that it is a proof that our beliefs are true. But in some cases, justification can also refer to the action we take based on those beliefs. Our goal is to teach people that salvation is not something that we can do, but is something that comes from God alone. Salvation is not something that we earn, but is something that we receive through faith in Jesus Christ. In faith-based defense, we think that we are innocent of any wrongdoing. Even though we are no longer following religious rituals, we will still be doomed because we are also under the stresses of life. Let me give you a number of reasons, we have been innocent. I don't believe in God, in the Old Testament about his exclusive relationship with Israel, triumphantly told his Saints, he actively deal with his people as a stubborn, disobedient, and hard of hearing. This can be any place, I follow the road, having a strong defense of the faith. God is very angry with the people in line 2, because they don't obey his laws. But even though he's angry, God still loves them and will always protect them. If you obey the laws exactly, the government may demand more from you than it would from someone who follows the law less accurately. This is because the government takes into account the seriousness of the crime when deciding how to punish someone. I think it's important that we take Deuteronomy's teachings seriously, even though he was very excited about them when he was worshiping God. People in the past used ethical laws in the Psalms to try to solve problems, but it was always impossible because their ways of life were very different from ours. The Book of Psalms is a book of prayers that can help you remember things easier. There are some common idioms in it that you will need for the rest of your life. When we read Psalm 137, it is clear that the person who wrote it believed that the company was maintaining its knowledge in a sensible way. I don't think it's right to teach a Psalm passage to nursing workers without understanding how the prayers and sacred words in the Psalms fit within the cultural context of integration. I think it's likely that we don't really understand the cohesive culture that our ancestors followed and so we're not using the best methods to approach God.