109 3 With words of hatred they surround me; they attack me for no reason. “What is the direct cause of the punishable offense? This is because they spoke in 'lying tongues,' redefining the law to do violence to others - the violence of the wicked.

 109 4 In exchange for my friendship, they accuse me, but I am a man of prayer. “The Psalmist executes a legal decree by precisely defining the direct conflict between a pagan and a dear saint. The eternal curse of moral law inoculates us with the curse of the wicked. Not an innocent of fiery prayer as we naturally think in this distinct culture. But a speaking prosecutor decree against violence against the remnant of Israel. God has decreed the childlike innocence of the chosen people.

 109 6 Appoint a wicked man to oppose him; let an accuser stand to his right. "The key question of whether the psalmist employs the established rule of categorically opposing a person who rightly accuses him and that all men are sinners, how can there be ample justification for applying this judgment correctly?" ? Universally condemn a sinner when all responsible men are sinners? Here we see the psalmist profitably employing a legitimate accusation against a wicked man. And there's got to be some other reason than just being a sinner. Understanding of the decree being established innocence and this conflict in the context of the curse.Since he profitably uses the Eternal Curse in his effective defense. All of his specific accusations are based on the cardinal sin of ra a. Which represents a particular sin that God must destroy in order to persevere in creation. God positively accuses Satan of considerable violence and murder. And the beloved saints profitably use these eternal curses to successfully defend the kingdom of God.