109 6 Appoint a wicked one to oppose him; leave an accuser on his right. "The key question is whether the psalmist uses the established rule of categorically opposing the person who rightly accuses him, and that all people are sinners, how can there be sufficient justification for the correct application of this sentence?" ? Everyone has sinned. All the good people are sinners too.

God ordered a wicked man to oppose him, and an accuser to stand to his right. "The key question of whether the psalmist is using the established rule of categorically turning against a person who rightly accuses him and that all human beings are sinners, how can there be sufficient justification to properly apply this judgment?" ?? When all responsible people are sinners, do you generally condemn sinners?

John was a good student. When all responsible people are sinners, do you generally condemn sinners?

109 6 Send a wicked man to his enemy; let the accuser stand on his right. how can there be sufficient justification for the correct application of this sentence?

 Here we see a man accusing a wicked man of profiting from a nefarious activity.  The Bible says that all people are sinners. Understand this conflict in the context of established innocence statutes and curses.

 The psalmist accuses a wicked man in a clever way in order to express a sentiment.  There must be some other reason than just being a sinner that makes it hard to believe in God. An understanding of this conflict in the context of laws and curses that have established innocence.

 The understanding of the decree being established innocence and this conflict in the context of the curse.

  Here, the psalmist accuses a wicked man of being a thief. There must be some other reason why you're not going to spend eternity in Heaven. 

 Because it is profitable for him to use the Eternal Curse in effective defense. All of the specific accusations are based on the cardinal sin of ra a. God must destroy violence in order to preserve in creation.

 Since he is profitable in using the Eternal Curse in his defense. All of his specific allegations are based on the cardinal sin of ra a. God must destroy violence to preserve creation.

  All his specific allegations are based on ra a's main crime.  The sin that God must destroy in order to preserve in creation is lust.

  The man uses the Eternal Curse in his defense to make a lot of money.  When someone is telling lies, they can get in big trouble.  God must destroy the sinful people who do bad things because they are hurting other people.

 His enemy can’t hurt him, so he uses curses to hurt his enemy. All of his accusations are based on the cardinal sin of ra'a. God had to destroy sin to save us.

  In the Bible, God accuses Satan of considerable violence and murder.  And the saints profitably use these curses to defend the kingdom of God.

 God said that Satan is a murderer.

  The saints use the eternal curses to fight with the devil and make the kingdom of God safe.

 109 6 Appoint a wicked man to oppose him; let an accuser stand to his right. "The key question of whether the psalmist employs the established rule of categorically opposing a person who rightly accuses him and that all men are sinners, how can there be ample justification for applying this judgment correctly?" ? Universally condemn a sinner when all responsible men are sinners? Here we see the psalmist profitably employing a legitimate accusation against a wicked man. And there's got to be some other reason than just being a sinner. Understanding of the decree being established innocence and this conflict in the context of the curse. Since he profitably uses the Eternal Curse in his effective defense. All of his specific accusations are based on the cardinal sin of ra a. Which represents a particular sin that God must destroy in order to persevere in creation. God positively accuses Satan of considerable violence and murder. And the beloved saints profitably use these eternal curses to successfully defend the kingdom of God.