How do we identify someone we have ne'er witnessed? How do we know He is speaking to the voice in our heads or us?How do we know the voice is merely coming from something we have acquired in the past? I undoubtedly do not believe we can have an idea without a description in words. This is my key point we accurately describe a thing or distinct personality comes from a expressive vocabulary that was created. We say a vocabulary is outside of our box that everyone writes. If is not communicated as we hear in our vocabulary is the same as saying there is no factual basis for it to be true. The unexplained communication represents nothing.

 God had an idea before it was established in objective reality. If we say God is totally unexplained we would have no concept of God as we properly speak. To be able to say God "means"are carefully distinguishing between no god and God. If God did not exist, we would not accept God in our vocabulary.My point is instead of saying when we describe what God says about Himself in the logical vocabulary, this cannot be because God has not revealed Himself in our vocabulary. We should be properly saying God gave us vocabulary to adequately explain Him enough so it sufficiently proves the logic we use, this vocabulary He gave us. Why would we limit the ideas in distinguishing God because we merely accept this narrow box of ideas? We place a box around God when we note the description we have about God must not be true because God cannot be apprehended in arguing against the ideas we introduce that you do not agree with.

 Everything that exist must properly maintain a sufficient reason. We accurately describe empirical evidence of a created thing with words in descriptive personality. Instead of using the argument we cannot properly understand the thing God created we do not receive a right to accurately describe that possible thing because our description is always limited by your fruitless argument it is a mystery. So you reject an acceptable description, then denying the purpose for which we distinguish who we are in comparison to other created objects. Why not merely say "Hey I never thought of that the way you describe it as you see Gods gifted language you have used to describe it? Why do you ignore the accurate description and position it in the arbitrary category of mystery because you are too dull(not with malice) to carefully examine it with your own ideas? It's wrong to limit ideas by crying mystery.  AR