How can we fairly condemn others for their sins when we ourselves are also guilty of sin? It is akin to denying the existence of something that is clearly evident or deeming someone as delusional for perceiving things that others cannot. It is asserting that there is a standard of behavior that applies universally except for oneself. This is the message conveyed by the apostle – who has the authority to accuse us in such a scenario?

The crux of the matter lies in the notion that only one entity possesses the authority to pass judgment. This raises complex inquiries regarding the validity of a moral benchmark, as God does not serve as an intermediary between the plaintiff and defendant. Should God be the sole arbiter capable of reconciling the conflicting parties, it is inevitable that many individuals will experience frustration. This is the central concern in the quest for survival in our world. It is evident that while men may serve as mediators, they often struggle to foster a sense of collective agreement.

When considering the inherent state of human beings in sin, it is necessary to rely on the concept of mystery due to our limited understanding of God's judgments. Are we then ensnared in a state of helplessness until the day of reckoning? If we truly require forgiveness or retribution to align with God's standard of symmetry in reconciling all things, then our reliance on His presence is essential in order to witness and comprehend His righteous judgments. In this way, our suffering is overshadowed by His divine protection, balancing out His disciplinary actions.