There exists a distinction between the concepts of "letting go" and "letting God" when it comes to understanding the internal workings of individuals in relation to their emotions and the process of healing in a comprehensive manner. This is in contrast to the reformed belief regarding the activities of the soul and the powers that are defined within the framework of renewal. These two perspectives are fundamentally different. One suggests that emotions are addressed through a step-by-step procedure, while the other (as I interpret it) defines renewal as a supernatural desire that originates from grace. As individuals seek God, this desire deepens and is supported by active Christians who do not view responsible behavior as a process, but rather as a manifestation of being united with Christ by giving from a supernatural gift paradigm. This holistic understanding of healing is a result of God's active provision for individuals who truly acknowledge their complete depravity and believe that they bring nothing to the table, deserving nothing in return. In such an environment, there is genuine sharing of gifts. This motivation is not driven by a desire for process, which can be seen as a philosophical control mechanism, but rather by a desire for grace through the gospel, which represents true freedom.

In the 20th century, there emerged a semi-plagianist perspective that contrasted with the beliefs of the 17th century. In this view, God is portrayed as weak, as He is depicted as waiting in the background for us to initiate change. Responsibility is then attributed to our own capacity for transformation through a process. Consequently, humanity is elevated, and the superficial aspects of this process solely evoke surface-level emotions on a horizontal plane. However, the reformed position, which is aligned with the Psalms (a subtle critique of those who adhere rigidly to predestination), maintains that those who accuse believers are always defeated by the prayers of the vulnerable. This is because God has always placed individuals in their positions through grace, and His work on their desires is conducted within an undeserved framework. The semi-plagianist perspective only offers a partial healing, as it revolves around human-centeredness and derives truth from philosophical notions. On the other hand, the sovereign viewpoint asserts that God is not solely a deity of healing, and His anger is only manifested in response to profound corruption, specifically targeting the self-righteous who are in a more disadvantageous state than the morally degenerate. Ironically, these self-righteous individuals burden the suffering ones even more while superficially alleviating their emotions.