I agree with you, but there are a few factors to consider. One of them is that our understanding of sin and its consequences is influenced by our own sinful nature. Therefore, we are essentially trying to redefine God's moral principles. This deviation occurs when individuals distort what is considered good and evil based on their own moral standards. Ultimately, instead of rejecting God's morals, individuals attempt to eliminate God by altering them. This distortion is a result of individuals viewing themselves as innocent and others as guilty. Through their own power, individuals manipulate God's laws to protect themselves and claim what rightfully belongs to God.

I contend that we are not simply advocating for the concept of innocence, as the very fabric of society has been reconfigured to favor our personal biases. Our sole recourse lies in acknowledging that God, in His infinite wisdom, unequivocally discerns innocence and guilt at all junctures, for His divinity would be compromised otherwise.

The intricacy of this issue is such that it necessitates God providing both innocence for certain individuals and empowering sinful individuals to defend His righteous retribution. How does God utilize laws, which are designed to oppose His intentions, to safeguard His followers? This paradox underscores the mysterious splendor of His ways.