One of the challenges we encounter in this endeavor to distinguish between our righteousness and God's is that it leaves us without a solution. Can a Christian be both righteous and unrighteous at the same time? This predicament has transformed into a linguistic game, dependent on which side we align with in the ongoing debate about grace. Is it possible to acknowledge the opposing viewpoint as a comprehensive perspective, fostering agreement among all parties? Alternatively, should we strive to consolidate our doctrines, starting from a common point A and progressing towards a unified point B? We commit a significant error when we adopt a philosophy that relies on the principles of cause and effect. Within the realm of Christian culture, it is customary to showcase our own righteousness as separate from that of God's, in an attempt to appear wise. Consequently, we find ourselves compartmentalizing our lives into deserving punishment while simultaneously defending God's justice. This selfless act of advocating for God's ways, despite being subjected to punishment, seems perplexing.