It appears that we are employing the Buddhist notion that rest entails achieving a state of absence of self-awareness. The awareness of self impedes a sense of fulfillment. Whenever I engage in discourse regarding the significance of faith as a means of personal growth in this context, there is an extensive and intricate endeavor to demonstrate that even these means cannot lead us to a state of nonexistence. However, we can discern the underlying intention of this deceptive plan and are astounded by the difficulty in articulating something that is so inherently paradoxical.In what manner can one elucidate the concept of non-existence? Your exertions and dogmatic assertions are employed in order to arrive at this juncture. However, I find it unnecessary to exert such effort, as I merely draw upon scriptural sources. Jesus, on the other hand, engaged in the process of discipleship with His followers, yet did not adhere to a structured plan. He deliberately concealed the identity of the traitor among His disciples throughout His ministry. One might jestingly inquire, Jesus, would it not be preferable for you to reveal the truth? Subsequently, He bestowed blessings upon them, only to abandon them during a time of immense turmoil.He arrived with the intention of pronouncing judgement upon the religious institution, as their actions seemed to undermine the divine covenant of God to rule from His sacred temple. Rather than embracing the established religious practices, He deliberately associated Himself predominantly with individuals considered to be sinful. The zenith of His teachings, wherein He censured the religious authorities, was exemplified in His defense of an adulterous individual. This deviates from the ethical principles that we commonly espouse as a moral benchmark.It is of utmost importance to acknowledge that Jesus fundamentally challenged the established system through which the disciples received their guidance in their relationship with God. By conducting a thorough examination of Jesus' ministry, it becomes clear that he employed a confrontational teaching style, which some may perceive as overly assertive towards his disciples. However, it is crucial to highlight that his actions were not driven by anger or personal bias, but rather by a deliberate and rational assessment of the prevailing religious structure and its authorities.Even within the sacred confines of the temple, Jesus' disruption of the money changers did not entail any physical harm to the individuals present. Rather, it symbolically subverted their misguided idols. It is crucial to acknowledge that Jesus was appointed by divine authority to act as a spokesperson for His people, utilizing His teachings to denounce those who were inflicting harm upon His followers. Jesus assumed the role of the innocent Savior, delivering His people without necessarily seeking to modify their behavior.