I have reservations about your perspective on free will, particularly in terms of how you define the concept of "will." If we define it as the ability to freely choose between good and evil while maintaining equilibrium, it could be argued that this type of will does not actually exist. The act of willing involves a preference for one option over another, and your assertion that the will drives its own actions is logically flawed because it cannot serve as both cause and effect. In essence, your theological framework is lacking a causal factor, which is tantamount to denying its existence.The proposition suggests that an individual possesses the capacity to independently make choices. Nonetheless, it remains ambiguous how the will can arrive at decisions without any external influences affecting its determinations. If the will is guided exclusively by the notion of freedom without any reasonable basis for its actions, then this understanding of freedom is flawed. The concept of self-determined freedom implies that the will harbors an antecedent intention to make a decision, but this leads to the question of what caused that initial intention. Ultimately, if there is no causal factor, then the concept of self-determined freedom becomes invalid.The primary subject of this discourse is the investigation of existence as a concept. The notion of freedom, which is determined by the individual, indicates the lack of existence. This suggests that non-existence is a component of the past and only transforms into existence through future decisions. Nevertheless, if there is no rational foundation for decision-making, the reliance on a Creator is superfluous. This viewpoint indicates that in the absence of God or if God is non-existent, individuals can only encounter existence in the future when they are reunited with God, who embodies existence.It can be posited that a person's perspective on religion is influenced by chance, given that they possess the ability to make choices based on their own reasoning. Matters that surpass logical thinking are classified as matters of faith. Although the individual recognizes the presence of divine intervention in their convictions, their belief in unadulterated free will ultimately conforms to practicality. Thus, any occurrences that fall beyond the boundaries of reason are viewed as being affected by luck, thereby exposing a deterministic worldview.Determinism is a philosophical perspective that rejects the idea of a divine power being responsible for the creation of humans and the establishment of moral accountability. It emphasizes the significance of personalized criteria for interpersonal relationships based on one's own subjective perceptions. Such a self-determined perspective may give rise to the phenomenon known as the "i - it syndrome".Within the framework of a universe governed by determinism, human morality and ethical discernment are of paramount importance in determining the course of human existence. However, by acknowledging the supreme authority of a divine Almighty and recognizing His fundamental place in the cosmos, humans establish a relationship of mutual respect with their creator. Such an approach fosters a harmonious existence between humans and the Trinity.