Regarding the idea of marriage love, there exist two theological perspectives. The initial belief asserts that the ability to make choices between good and evil is imperative for genuine liberty. Nonetheless, this notion overlooks that true freedom entails a distinct inclination towards a particular decision. In the absence of a definite preference, the act of will is absent. Therefore, this notion of freedom is not truly freedom, as it does not enable individuals to actively select what they genuinely desire.The level of enjoyment we experience from an object and our perception of it have a significant impact on whether or not we act upon it. It is important to recognize that although the will enables us, it is ultimately the mind that determines our choices. This distinction has important implications for practical decisions, such as selecting a marriage partner. If one subscribes to the idea that true freedom entails the ability to choose between good and evil without inherent inclination towards either, then it is necessary to recognize that the power of choice rests with the object, rather than the will, which lacks the capacity to choose.Adopting the pragmatist perspective on liberty may positively impact one's marital relationship, as it entails relinquishing control and relying on God. Conversely, the Calvinistic notion of liberty involves selecting options based solely on personal preference, without allowing the circumstances or individuals involved to influence one's decision-making process.This study will prioritize the internal factors such as motives and intentions, rather than solely focusing on the external power of objects. By shifting the focus to the heart, individuals can freely express love without being distracted by insignificant details. The absence of evil in heaven provides a greater sense of freedom compared to the limitations and constraints caused by evil on earth.