KK "But here's the question. If God has effective control over everything, without the possibility of" free choice, "then it seems perfectly reasonable that He will ultimately save everything, because His nature is love. There is perfect love (as it is) , then He will not force anyone to love Him and serve Him forever against His will, and this in turn will lead to the consent / empowerment of the people to choose whether to spend eternity in full unity with Him or in complete separation from the Source of Life. that the trust of a fully sovereign God, who does not allow real choices or freedom of will, will lead to faith in the salvation of the universe, even if the Scriptures are not clear. Please specify this in every detail. " When we say that we are successful because we voluntarily give within our reasonable limits the required knowledge, understanding, etc. But if we naturally choose something because God intended us to come and choose absolutely, then there is no limit to our potential success. Our plausible reasons for choosing the right thing are realistic and go beyond our personal boundaries. The Bible describes only a wicked man who chose to prove his inevitable political success within his own means. He was a man who had become his own god. In modern jargon, it is "self-taught". There is no absolute need for "divine light" from God. From God's perspective, there would be no dynamic application. If God is God, then he experiences the humble beginning of the desired end. If God were to take the place of experiencing the humble beginning of the coveted end, he would have to succeed in all the complex details that reasonably describe his official history. If God reduces his accurate description of historical events to our impeded vision, he cannot be justified in proving himself. In our personal opinion, according to recognized sovereignty, we reasonably believe that our successful choice remains a historically accurate image of God.