Careless people just make up these quirky words to mis-describe something that goes on between people. But I don't think that's the main problem. To be honest, I would like to say that we can accurately describe a historical situation with slanderous words that can be part of the acute problem. But I think responsible people can speak in precise terms about miraculous deliverance and eternal salvation, but when it comes to applying these objective truths inevitably to a specific situation, they mistakenly treat the Bible as solving some impossible things, but not he solves practical things. No one likes to popularly think of extraordinary things in the absolute sense. We like to describe people as enabler, bipolar, or manic-depressive, but the Bible describes only two identified categories. And I keep saying that naively believing the free gospel is absolutely not about being able to speak those gospel truths, it's about using the free gospel diligently. Gospel becomes the main theme in each case. And all these other ideas are simply inconsistent as personal truths, because they simply describe general situations, but don't resolve all the critical details about the people exposed, so that we can reliably distinguish one comparable situation from another. That's the logistical problem with this thinking. It inappropriately portrays a person portrayed in an image that is inconsistent with the way we should view ourselves as faithful Christians. And we're just dealing with these similar weird things when we look at the Old Testament scriptures of the Bible. We look at these contentious relationships simply for purely psychological reasons. But the Bible adequately describes the main characters in a much more nuanced way. The Light of the Sovereign of God works through good deeds and destructive deeds. And as I have said before, of course, if we think of the official history of salvation, God carefully brings us profound truths too terrible to face and too wonderful to describe an Old Testament saint in such luminous words. I have consistently held to that, and that God's view of responsible man at all times is a clear line of blessing and curse.That kind of grand vision then changes the solid moral structure, as God notes. Because God generously provides for terribly destructive people and curses what seem to be truly moral people. But we can't play God. We don't see who is good enough to be blessed by God through us. We cannot always say that it is contradictory that God misrepresents him in this Old Testament story because one is silent regarding another person's chastisement or suffering. We must rise to this continuum of curses and blessings so that we are free to appropriately minister to an exposed person without inevitably putting them in our own box.