When you offer that kind of practical advice or try to act as you're simplifying a persons status before God you're instantly opening a significantly big can of worms for yourself. First of all who can constantly read another persons heart? When you say a likely person is really saved on the inside because of some typical kind of specific profession, or an apparent change in life style and you're simply saying that an unknown person had a heart change. When you're certain, a person had a heart change that you can follow hearts. Also you can judge as directly as God. I suppose we authentically need to leave the moral judgement up to the sacred scripture because a responsible person could be floundering with a sin, a terribly grave sin, and another person could be clean as"the wind driven snow," maintaining all of the T's crossed and the I's on the dotted line and yet have a full heart of dead men bones. It's downright dangerous to take part in reading hearts. However, he's not beyond Godly grace, If a person apostatizes. But what his deplorable condition makes it insolvable for him to turn since he has scornfully rejected the Spirits work on his heart as an unbeliever. But Gods grace can indeed reverse that or bring the person to show by his repentance he always had the grace, and for a period was apostatizing. We don't know indeed when someone apostatized what will inescapably be or what happens in his heart before he dies. God simply knows. This crucial passage really remains not an absolute rule. You're simply saying the joe is allegedly saved and generally loses his eternal deliverance. How do you know he was faithfully delivered if you can not follow his heart?