Your theory revolves around itself. I suppose I'll speak to you directly in a simple manner since you didn't react to anything I said. I think your reading level is too easy. If God is indeed "final", when He reconciles people to himself and no one in line with the wicked is reconciled, then how can He be "final" when we all still sin? If God has sealed the deal, don't you think that His rules of reconciliation will be taught in a way that will keep us safe?When you say that God will represent sinners on both sides of salvation. If indeed all people are sinners, but God reconciles some people while having no desire to know God, but some people who ignore God are not reconciled, then how can we do that? Do we know that we are reconciled when we question our own faith or when we sin and fail seriously?

If we seek God but fail and at the same time the other person has no evidence of salvation but is in the same reconciliation, how can we know that we are reconciled? The others teach that reconciliation is universal because God gives it to all people, but you teach that reconciliation is for those who deserve it because they belong to Christ and at the same time in an obviously different relationship in the same way, but already Enjoying peace there is no proof of reconciliation, that both are reconciled, that is a contradiction.In a way, he is closer to proper teaching than you are. If you can show me where the Bible teaches two types of reconciliation, go ahead. If it's just a reconciliation, you're contradicting yourself. I don't see any teaching in the Bible in which God describes a relationship with the “bad guys”, on the contrary.