You always mention the verses of the enemy sermon and yet there is no connection between your teachings and the Old Testament Law, Christ came to earth as a sacrifice and a Lamb, but he did not renounce his authority on earth. . In the context of the Lord of Heaven. He described His coming to earth as the "Sovereign Lord" of the Old Testament, the highest position of authority that invades the strong man's house.The strong must first be bound before they can be plundered. The context of Christ's teaching was to address the problems of society in order to bind the strong man. Then He came as a ruler in the Old Testament sense. God was now on earth among his people.
But Christ was human too, so he had to withstand the strong man as a man. He was not a superhuman character who would not get involved in conflict in a one-man experience.He experienced the pain and conflict of a man; As a man, his goal was salvation, so he took sides.
God in his sovereignty only has redemptive intentions that require defense. He never defied his own success in the paradigm of potentials. Wherever He went, His goal was to bind the strong man.His word is never neutral. When he brought up the issue of enemies, it was in the context of destructive edicts. In other words, you cannot take advantage of the poor and downtrodden by treating them as enemies. You have to meet their needs... you cannot abuse your authority. He had made his point before he reached the strong man.