If Jesus Christ died for the whole world and the Bible says that his death gives us our only person, and the power of His glorious resurrection is our strength, then “ours” would be the whole world in his mind. Unless he says we have potential. But what is the benefit of potential? This is not about the basics of focusing on bilateral relations. If personal salvation is only meant to deal decisively with political issues that have nothing to do with man and God, how awkward do we place it when we speak?Isn't this the whole purpose of God to ensure the salvation of man in the various mutual relationships between them?
So, instead of reaching our goal of salvation, we stick to trivial things; If God set the whole world free, then no one would be condemned, but God is also the judge of suffering. How do you show potential in the history timeline? It's like living constantly in a play mindset. Will the saved potential be carried over into the future? No wonder nobody knows!There are no potential events in the novel that fall into the chronology of history. This is what you imagine when you follow something that was never part of God's plan. If necessary, this will be an up-to-date event. Such sentimental ideas.
Why should we say that it is more important to think that God does not have much favor with man and that since we are part of "man," we cannot believe that God actually provides by His choice, as was done? Appointed for our good? Are we special enough to decide how much love God has for us by wanting to believe in ideas of possible salvation?Who in vain will provide political money for this shadow operation? If this is not a reckless game, so I tried to reform our way of divination, showing that God, as the ruler of the world, upholds the choice, requires a fair explanation that there is a curse and a blessing in every inch of it. The universe. Truth.