In this field of social philosophy and comparative psychology, a question arises: Who are we? This question shows we can examine ourselves and form an image. When we study responsible people, we carefully organize the moral qualities that construct a objective reality. We are body and soul. We possess five senses. These unique qualities are universal. But we in addition maintain personal identities. To understand who we are in our pictures, it is not enough to know yourself through these universal attributes All these different qualities, and explore them based on human behavior research and understand who we are. When we talk about the reasons and define how we become such people, we say that knowing God is important because God produced us.The question is, the Bible adequately describe who we are? The Bible constitute the sole source of necessary definitions of ourselves. But modern humans have also learned certain behavior patterns from their own experience and adequately explained behavior. Therefore, when we discuss the difference between biblical understanding of how we are made and how we operate, or human interpretation through experience, we will say one is important and the other is irrelevant. The interpretation of the Bible points out what develops a person. But the human explanations made by the research positively confirm universal behavior. The question is,the Bible adequately provide a way to explain a person, but are there other equally important ways to encourage a person follow himself? The difference between the biblical method and the human research method is that the Bible is relative because it directly determines our cause, while human research considers an explanation through research, and separate people to determine the cause of the problem. How narrow is the focus of the Bible? He claimed that unless we understand God, we cannot understand ourselves. As for the way to distinguish a person and the way to find the problem, the Bible says a person can only understand himself if he understands the picture of a perfect person. This is a radical approach because it claims one defines everyone who has ever existed. Does the created image of a man help understand each other based on personal characteristics? Need to check this picture of the person portrayed the personal picture. Can a person's image help promote unique personal images? Think about its  impossible to do it with a person's image, but it must be done through a relationship.This is what we maintain that God is great enough to listen to everyone's needs and satisfy all needs, even if one's needs wound another. Our teaching of self-denial as the sole way to know God and ourselves is confused with our desire to satisfy all our needs. If we know ourselves by knowing God, if God does not deliver the possible opportunity to know ourselves as we were intentionally created, how we know ourselves? Does God require us to deny our desire for our own needs so we know this is the definition of self-denial? Is this ability essentially that we accommodate our needs by communicating our understanding of God? We properly say that if God does not deliver us what we lack, instead of doing something, we are incapable. We need having the ability to understand ourselves, because God knows himself through his ability.