Do modern philosophy and psychology answer the essential question of ourselves? This question assumes we can look at ourselves and form an image. When we observe people, we organize their qualities. The Bible says we are body and soul. We naturally possess five senses. These necessary attributes are universal. But we in addition possess diverse identities. To know who we are, it is not enough to emphasize these universal qualities. The philosophical question is whether we can distinguish these diverse qualities. And based on empirical research on considerate behavior, thoroughly examine them to find  ourselves? When discussing the reason, we exist because God has fashioned us, it is critical that we are aware. The key question is, the Bible provide a thorough understanding of ourselves? The Bible remains the sole source of substantial definitions of ourselves. But mortal beings have also discovered certain behavior patterns through empirical observations, and scientifically explained them in personality files. Therefore, if we correctly discuss the difference between the Bible’s understanding of our development and function, or the interpretation of humans through experience, one is essential and the other is irrelevant. A convincing interpretation of the Bible focuses on the source of what constitutes a person, but ethical research will naturally determine general behavior patterns. The key question is: Does the Bible provide an effective way to explain who a person is, but are there other equally important ways to assist a person appreciate himself? Observe the difference between the Bible and the humane method. The focus of the study is that when a person observes people, separates them, and identifies specific problems, the Bible directly connects our concerns to God. How narrow represent the comparative analysis of the Bible? He claimed we didn't understand ourselves unless we know who God is. The Bible says that if a person interprets the unique image of the perfect Person, he can fully express himself instead of dividing a person pragmatically and identifying specific problems.This is a radical approach because it claims that One Man fully defines every possible person who has perpetually lived. Can the image of a man aid many men to accept each other based on their exceptional qualities? This personalized single-person look must be all-encompassing. Can the image of men help you create a unique personal image? Think about it carefully, and it cannot be presented through the sensitive imagination of a person's image, but through a meaningful relationship with the Person. There are reasons to conclude that God is great enough to listen to everyone sympathetically, and will usually satisfy all needs, even if one person’s specific needs inevitably suffer subversive consequences for another. We mistakenly accepted the doctrine of self-denial, believing this is the only way to truly know God. And ourselves, satisfy our desire to satisfy all basic needs. If we know ourselves by knowing God, how do, we know God has not given us knowledge? Does God command us to resolutely reject the desire to satisfy our needs so that we can regard it as self-denial? We to precisely follow God's function through communication to accommodate our needs?When God does not give us the ability to exceed productivity, we want, we claim we are incompetent. We need being able to understand who we are, because God knows himself well enough.