No man ideally has a comprehensives view of eternal truth.Because all men are prejudice. The question is if we cannot enforce the law correctly then how can we be responsible for the abuse of prejudice if we are all prejudice? This is exactly what I have been disputing. I have to struggle with coming to a logical understanding of Gods sovereignty in allowing the abuse and mans responsibility of the prejudice practice of abuse. For God to not be prejudice He must be absolutely justified at all times. He must never exercise His attributes inconsistent with whom He is.
Consequently, God must steadfastly maintain sufficient reasons in exercising His divine sovereignty. If God did not reveal the reasonable exercise of His divine sovereignty we would have no reason to faithfully uphold the law that typically prevents the abuse of social prejudice. Gods reasons are revealed in His authoritative pronouncements of law, covenants, curses, decrees, statutes and promises. Since God did not design robots we accept sovereignty reveals the reasons that His word is backed up by communicating He is sincerity of always being justified. We cannot be reasonably satisfied with the convenient excuse that God is unjustified in our peaceful lives because He is mysterious. Therefore, God gave us the reasonable pronouncements in our rudimentary language to satisfy His more extensive knowledge. Our rudimentary understanding of uniting our personal sense of justice with the sovereign exercise of divine justice. We are sufficiently satisfied that Gods justice is carried out on this earth through His reasonable exercise of blessing and cursing.