Let's take a moment to compare God's infinite, boundless love with a humorous or exaggerated imitation of that love. Imagine that God's love is represented by a massive pitcher filled with pure, clear water. This pitcher is so enormous that it stretches beyond our ability to see around it, symbolizing the vastness and immeasurable nature of God's love itself. In this imagery, the pitcher embodies the fullness and completeness of God's love—an unending, pure source of divine affection. Now, if we try to pour this water into a glass, that glass becomes a symbol of how God's love might be expressed or perceived in a limited way. The glass represents a fragment or reflection of God's love, yet it is only an incomplete representation—because it cannot fully capture the eternal and infinite scope of God's creation and love in its entirety. The real distinction lies in understanding the difference between the actuality of God's love and the way we attempt to portray or grasp it. The structure of the glass—our limited representations—are secondary; what truly matters is the reality of love itself. Because of this, grace must come first—before any human effort to understand or contain divine love. Grace precedes our attempts at comprehension, guiding us beyond mere images or imperfect reflections toward the true reality of God's boundless love. Within this glass, we place a figure—representing humanity—trying to understand or embody God's love. But then, man makes a conscious decision: he attempts to shape the glass so that it accurately reflects the true nature of God's love, or perhaps his own limited understanding of it. He imagines what love truly is, trying to mirror God's infinite love within the confines of this small vessel. What I am emphasizing is that, just as God’s love is vast and limitless, the reflection or representation of that love in the glass is merely a shadow or a fragment of the real thing. The core point is that the goodness or the quality of love itself remains unchanged—what makes God's love divine is not the vessel or the way it is depicted, but the love's inherent nature.