In summary, the discussion presents two contrasting perspectives: one that emphasizes the importance of careful, faithful interpretation of Scripture to uphold the integrity of the gospel message, and another that highlights the potential pitfalls of manipulating biblical texts or adopting doctrines that conflict with biblical teachings. Both viewpoints serve as valuable considerations in understanding the nature of grace, salvation, and the authority of Scripture in the Christian life. Through attentive study and observation, I have also noticed that some individuals possess a sincere and genuine grasp of the concept of grace. They understand its importance and significance in the Christian faith. However, despite their understanding, they often struggle to articulate what grace truly entails in a clear and precise manner. This difficulty arises because the gospel itself embodies both a simple message and a complex set of truths. The straightforwardness of the gospel makes it accessible to all, yet its deeper, more intricate elements serve to preserve its profound meaning and richness. These complex elements are essential—they prevent the gospel from becoming overly simplified or distorted by human reasoning and philosophical interpretations. In essence, the complexity acts as a safeguard, ensuring that the core message remains pure and untainted. Our goal, therefore, is to promote clarity in communicating the gospel message, emphasizing that it fundamentally embodies unmerited, absolute grace. This stands in contrast to notions that suggest grace is something that can be shared, divided, or reciprocally exchanged among individuals. It is crucial to affirm that the Bible is self-affirming and self-evident—its divine authority and truth stand on their own, capable of bringing about salvation to those who believe. Recognizing this, we must also accept that human beings possess a degree of free will and autonomy. This acknowledgment requires us to adjust our understanding of divine authority and human responsibility. If humans are indeed autonomous, then our interpretation of Scripture must account for this reality. Such a perspective challenges the doctrine of absolute grace—implying that grace operates independently of human response—and introduces the possibility of competing views about divine sovereignty and human free will. As the Apostle Paul warned, diverging from the biblical view of divine grace can lead to theological errors and distortions. For example, K.K. makes a statement claiming that "God has reconciled the outcast," which is expressed in the past tense. This phrasing suggests that reconciliation has already been fully accomplished, a view that does not align with the broader biblical perspective that God's reconciliation work continues into the future or is ongoing. Such a statement, therefore, reflects a particular theological stance—specifically, that of universalism, which emphasizes that ultimately all beings will be reconciled to God. This position is consistent with the principles of universal reconciliation, which interpret Scripture as indicating a universal and complete restoration of all creation.