I have noticed that some individuals genuinely grasp the concept of grace; however, when they try to express or explain it, they often struggle to communicate its true essence with clarity. As I have previously mentioned, the gospel embodies both simplicity and complexity. The complex aspects of the gospel play a crucial role in safeguarding its core message of straightforwardness. Essentially, this means resisting the temptation to rely on elaborate human theories or philosophies when defending or explaining the gospel. Our goal is not only to clarify what the gospel truly is but also to uphold the doctrinal truth that it is rooted in sovereign grace, rather than a form of shared or mutual grace. It is vital to recognize, however, that Scripture itself affirms and validates its messages. The Bible possesses the divine power to accomplish the deliverance it promises. If we accept the idea that human beings have a certain measure of free will or autonomy, then our understanding of authority and responsibility within Scripture shifts accordingly—this challenges the doctrine of sovereign grace and may lead to a worldview where human effort and decision-making are given undue importance, potentially fostering a competitive or self-reliant attitude, as the apostle Paul warned. This topic involves two distinct viewpoints. The first concerns the misapplication or misuse of biblical texts to bolster personal agendas or preconceived notions. Such manipulation often involves ignoring or downplaying parts of Scripture that do not fit one's preferred interpretation. Many people tend to interpret Scripture through their own lens, often comparing themselves to others and setting their standards of success based on their subjective perceptions. While everyone may have imperfect or flawed understandings of spiritual truth, some individuals, relying solely on human reasoning, develop doctrines that directly oppose God's true nature. For instance, Kks asserts that God has already reconciled with the rejected, a statement expressed in the past tense, which does not align with the biblical teaching that God’s view of reconciliation extends into the future for all. This position, therefore, aligns with universalism—the idea that all will ultimately be saved—contradicting the biblical doctrine of particular redemption and sovereign grace.