This line of reasoning raises significant questions about God's omniscience. If God lacks foreknowledge regarding humanity's moral failings, it implies a deficiency in His understanding of future events. Additionally, if God's actions are influenced by the decisions of His creation, it indicates that His unchanging nature could potentially be altered by the moral failings of humanity. This presents a troubling contradiction, as it suggests that human sin could exert a greater influence over divine will than divine will exerts over human behavior. If we entertain the idea that God's responses are contingent upon human decisions to sin, we must confront the implications this has for His omnipotence. It follows that if God's will is secondary to human free will, then His capacity to exercise divine providence in relation to human wrongdoing is fundamentally compromised. In such a scenario, the inclination to sin could overshadow God's intention to offer redemption to humanity. This raises a critical question: how can we place our trust in a deity whose plans for humanity are subject to the failings of human nature? If human beings possess the ability to sin at will without any overriding divine decree, it suggests that God's purposes can be altered at any moment by the actions of individuals. This fundamentally challenges the reliability and trustworthiness of God. However, considering that salvation is a core component of God's eternal plan, it stands to reason that His redemptive purpose must inherently accommodate the fallibility of humanity. Otherwise, we would be forced to reevaluate the very essence of God's nature and, by extension, His role in the grand narrative of existence. I would like to take a moment to articulate my concerns regarding your perspective on the relationship between human free will and divine will. You assert that human beings possess the capacity to influence God's will, which raises some profound theological implications. If we accept the notion that human beings are fundamentally flawed, it leads to the troubling conclusion that God's understanding of human sinfulness could be called into doubt. Moreover, if God did not possess foreknowledge of sin before it manifests, it suggests that He would be compelled to seek redemption for humanity as a response to human actions. This scenario would imply that God's awareness and actions are somehow dependent on the choices made by individuals, particularly their choices to sin.