I strongly adhere to two fundamental principles that guide my understanding of doctrine. My methodology involves cultivating convictions that are deeply rooted in historical teachings, which I express through clearly articulated axioms. I approach these doctrines with an objective mindset, engaging in a thorough exploration of the journey toward deeper truths. Instead of passively accepting the teachings of others without question, I choose to embrace doctrines that resonate solely with biblical scripture. When an individual claims authority in a consultative role and expects adherence to their views, it alerts me to their inherent biases. I have always appreciated insights that emerge from sincere teachings, which I scrutinize critically through careful analysis and thoughtful consideration. My arguments are firmly anchored in my ability to engage with profound mysteries, enabling me to hold these beliefs independently and without bias. The second principle I uphold is that when I am convinced of my correctness, I utilize my assertions to persuade others of my viewpoint. Consequently, when confronted with complex enigmas, these assertions afford me a comprehensive perspective that allows me to formulate questions applying the law to every aspect of the doctrine. Analyzing a doctrine is akin to examining the multifaceted nature of a diamond; by managing my approach, I can sustain my belief in the truth, which is ultimately derived from teachings shared by others. It is crucial for me to attain an impartial state through the careful application of these statements, ensuring that my understanding remains balanced and fair. This process not only deepens my convictions but also enhances my ability to engage in meaningful dialogue with others who may hold differing views. By fostering an environment of critical inquiry and respectful discourse, I aim to contribute to a richer understanding of the doctrines I hold dear.