I truly appreciate your willingness to express your belief that individuals are reconciled at birth. This shows a significant level of conviction and commitment on your part, which is certainly commendable. However, I must point out that it is not necessary for you to provide an extensive array of textual evidence to support your viewpoint, as it does not rest on a solid historical foundation. In this ongoing discussion, the only viewpoints that hold real significance are those that I have articulated and those that Joker has presented. Regrettably, your perspective appears to be irrelevant because of the inherent contradictions it contains. You seem to be suggesting that belief and unbelief—two positions that are fundamentally opposed to one another—can lead to the same relational outcomes, which is quite problematic. I would encourage you to delve deeper into the principle of non-contradiction, which is a foundational element of classical logic. This principle asserts that a proposition cannot be both true and false in the same context at the same time. Understanding this concept may help clarify your position and highlight the inconsistencies it contains.