To facilitate a more comprehensive discussion, we suggest a closer examination of the first book, possibly by breaking the content into smaller, more digestible segments. Calvin articulates the notion that every individual harbors an intrinsic desire to worship a sovereign power. We argue that there exists a clear demarcation between two distinct realities. Given that God has instilled in humanity a consciousness of the divine, it follows that individuals hold full accountability for their rebellion and animosity toward God. If, as KK claims, humanity possesses the inherent capacity to seek God, it would imply that God is culpable for humanity's failure to connect with Him, since He created humanity with an innate ability for authentic spiritual faith. This inconsistency illustrates why KK's interpretation of our position is not entirely accurate. Should humanity indeed have the ability to pursue God, it raises troubling implications regarding God's power, allowing individuals to attribute blame to Him for perceived deficiencies. Consequently, we maintain that individuals, in their unregenerate state, are spiritually blind, utterly helpless, and wholly depraved—incapable of seeking God unless He first extends His hand. Although individuals are accountable for their choices, this responsibility is grounded in the true state of their souls. Our understanding of sin and depravity necessitates the assertion that salvation is not merely advantageous but fundamentally essential. In contrast, KK presents a narrative that undermines the concept of personal responsibility concerning one’s spiritual condition.