This issue serves as a point of contention between proponents of libertarian free will and those who adhere to belief in God. I prefer not to delve into theological debates, as I have already extensively explored this topic. If individuals were judged solely based on their disobedience, it implies that they possessed the capacity to obey the law on their own. Therefore, the question arises: did their disobedience go against God's intentions? If we assert that God intended to set forth laws and hold people accountable to them, it raises the dilemma of whether anyone can truly meet a perfect standard. This concept would create a scenario in which no individual could attain righteousness in their imperfection, thereby undermining their confidence before God.

If God holds Christians accountable for their imperfections according to His standards, what incentive is there to try to please Him? In doing so, we may actually be in a worse position than those who do not even attempt to seek God's approval. Pagans, who do not feel the need to meet any specific standard, do not have to face the consequences of falling short. They may not even be aware of the existence of God, as evidenced by their lack of interest in scripture or spiritual matters. Without any spiritual appetite, there is no motivation to seek out a higher power. It is puzzling why some individuals argue for their own righteousness when they do not even have a desire to connect with God. This behavior can be seen as not only misguided but also self-destructive, as it suggests a disregard for any external moral authority.

The Bible discusses the distinction between individuals who actively seek a relationship with God and those who do not see the need to do so. It also emphasizes that all humans are inherently flawed and fall short of righteousness. The concept is that if God were to judge individuals based on their sins, no one would be able to stand. However, the difference lies in the fact that those who seek God acknowledge their inability to meet His standards, while unbelievers are indifferent to the idea of a higher power. The fundamental question is, can anyone claim to approach God based on their own obedience? Can anyone assert that their actions are truly pleasing to God?

If we acknowledge that we fall short of God's standards, it is only those who recognize this who can be considered righteous in His eyes. How can we claim to be righteous while still engaging in sinful behavior? It is because we understand that our righteousness comes from Christ. Those who understand their righteousness in Christ will hold themselves to a higher standard, as they know that God's judgment will ultimately remove all evil. If God does not tolerate sin or sinners, what do you think He would say if we were to face Him? He would condemn us. However, as believers, we are saved from this condemnation because Christ took on the curse for us. This is our only hope for acceptance before God. In God's realm, there is no gray area - it is either life or death. He cannot take pleasure in sin, as it goes against His nature.