The concept of the dualistic pedagogical model presents a complex and perplexing idea, suggesting that there is a fundamental separation between the viewpoint of the Creator and our own human perspective. This implies that these two realms do not overlap. However, it is important to acknowledge that logical reasoning follows the principle of non-contradiction, which means that it is impossible to attribute both evil and goodness to an individual in a single instance. As a result, the dualistic approach seems to contain contradictions within it. Nevertheless, we acknowledge our redemption through an undeserved favor and navigate our existence within the boundaries of this kind and generous divine influence.This event serves as a manifestation of the principles taught by Jesus. In this particular case, a wealthy individual approached Jesus seeking guidance on how to further contribute, believing they had fulfilled all their legal obligations. Jesus expressed dissatisfaction with this inquiry and emphasized the individual's responsibility to fully comply with the law. This incident aligns with a recurring theme in Jesus' ministry. In the Old Testament, the nation of Israel was prohibited from engaging in warfare without first seeking divine approval. This requirement was established because, despite having a system of established laws and regulations, the governmental institution of Israel lacked the authority to initiate warfare.The central focus of the inquiry revolved not around the means by which they were to carry out their obligations, but rather on the underlying rationale for being bestowed with the celestial prophecies. They did not contemplate the notion that, by possessing the prophecies, they were empowered to fulfill God's covenant, which entailed displacing their adversaries from the territory pledged to them. Rather, they were explicitly prohibited from engaging in autonomous action.What was the reaction of the individuals when questioned about how they demonstrated their allegiance to God? They conveyed that their fidelity was not contingent upon their possessions or capabilities, but rather hinged entirely upon the Name or supremacy of the Lord. They did not assert that they were compelled to adhere to this conduct based on divine decree, but rather recognized that it is solely God who accomplishes it.