In this unique circumstance, it is of utmost importance to recognize that pushing ourselves to our limits can evoke feelings of insignificance or a complete surrender of the wisdom we have gained, encompassing both our earthly and spiritual aspirations. It is crucial to understand that our essence extends beyond our inner self; instead, we are composed of both our soul and tangible form. Consequently, we demonstrate our devotion to God through both our inner being and physical deeds, as they hold equal significance and value. Being selfless should not be misinterpreted as rejecting personal knowledge, but rather as integrating the enlightenment we have acquired on our quest to resemble Christ. This necessary understanding sets us apart from others' knowledge.This concept bears great relevance in understanding one's contingent self, devoid of any negative connotations towards selflessness. It proposes that by immersing ourselves in prolonged periods of study and adapting moments of meditation, we can discover a profound sense of fulfillment in our quest for knowledge. When individuals express the reasons behind their perceptive nature, it becomes a personal and accountable justification for their spiritual impact, arising from their superior understanding compared to others. It is crucial to note that this statement does not seek to offer apologies, as that would be insincere modesty. Upholding a society that cherishes and honors those with limited knowledge would be a step backward.Due to a noticeable lack of essential wisdom, my community faces the threat of complete destruction. Furthermore, it has been recently suggested that adequately preparing for a religious vocation requires possessing a greater amount of knowledge than individuals may truly believe they possess. It is widely accepted that a deep personal understanding is often demanded by God, which can be achieved through self-reflection or diligent acquisition of knowledge. Failing to acknowledge Him, His desires, or His devoted endeavors in an ideal realm will strip our selfless acts of any meaningful reward. We can hold differing opinions in a respectful manner while still engaging in meaningful conversations. Therefore, we are not moved or discouraged by an opposing personal standpoint.f we were to apply this perspective to the standards of the local church, it would give rise to a different set of contemplations. The belief that our physical abilities possess imperfections while our souls retain flawlessness is akin to the notion of perfectionism, albeit falling just shy of such a classification. This is because our actions are not solely determined by our own volition, but rather they are influenced by external forces. When we adopt an arrogant and self-governing mindset, we are setting ourselves up for disappointment, leading to an unpredictable outlook on life. It is incorrect to assume that we must choose between our flawed physical desires and our faultless soul with its perfect capabilities. The primary cause for this lies in the fact that our actions are influenced by a multitude of factors, while the ultimate objective remains steadfast, providing evidence of the root cause.The key to a positive outcome lies in having reasonable desires, while negative desires naturally lead to negative outcomes. Evil arises from the imperfect development of the heart within an individual. Therefore, if there is any evil stemming from corrupt body parts, the root cause lies within the corrupt soul. This argument is based on the intricate connection between corrupt senses and corrupt desires within the soul, which ultimately influences our choices. I firmly believe that this understanding teaches us the importance of contingency rather than independence. It highlights the fact that selflessness is reliant on God, who maintains control over all events through His ideal image of Himself. Thus, everything that happens is contingent upon His personal guidance. If anything were to occur outside of God's will or if there were any flaws in His contingent image, it would disrupt the entire system.The situation at hand is not attributed to any specific individual. Instead, there is a factor that He has managed to avoid, which is dependent on external circumstances beyond His control. It is clear that He lacks the ability to make independent decisions, making this factor quite ordinary. Moreover, if He did not cause this factor, it suggests a lack of understanding about personal autonomy. He deliberately allowed sin to exist in order to emphasize His own autonomy, rather than it being solely a reflection of His desires. This idea presents a puzzling question. How can He have the highest authority if there is no hierarchical structure below Him? Furthermore, how can His love hold true moral value if there is no contrast provided by the presence of sin?