The theoretical framework of Two line theology posits that individuals ought to endeavor towards achieving a serene and amicable coexistence with other members of society. Its objective is to demarcate a distinct boundary between the secular realm and the church in order to attain a state of tranquility. Nevertheless, Two line theology represents a mystical ideology that contests the notion that moral accomplishments can be articulated through language, thus advancing the principle of universal parity among all entities. In essence, this perspective negates the existence of moral differentiations.The gospel message cannot be viewed as only a partial solution for meeting the needs of saints within the church and the broader society. Rather, it is a message that is validated through its embodiment in reality. Its effectiveness can be traced through a series of documented events that were divinely spoken into existence. Ultimately, the gospel provides deliverance for God's people from the pervasive evil that exists both in the world and under the influence of the devil.The claim that the book of Joshua does not accurately portray conquest raises concerns about the rationale behind such actions. The viewpoint presented in Deuteronomy emphasizes the importance of God's holiness and the obligation to maintain divine principles within the Israelite community. However, this perspective fails to fully acknowledge the widespread and deeply embedded nature of sin that permeates the entire society, despite acknowledging the possibility of individuals failing to uphold moral standards.The lack of any mention of judgment in two specific lines of the Gospel has prompted some to argue that it functions mainly as a tool for regulating the conduct of believers by way of admonishments and directives, in order to redirect their attention towards the Gospel. Nonetheless, this interpretation neglects the reality that the theme of conquest is a fundamental concern in the Old Testament, which is crucial for comprehending God's unchanging character as a defensive God in the future.The Old Testament serves as a valuable resource for comprehending God's worldview. It elucidates God's objective of concluding history by emancipating the world from enslavement and steering humanity towards divine justice. The text exemplifies God's intervention in saving his favored saints from malevolence and demise. The earth is depicted as a domain where individuals revere inanimate idols, but God enlivens his chosen ones, who eventually become leaders and spiritual guides that play a pivotal role in God's just retribution against depravity and corrupt individuals for everlasting time.The initial assertion presents a counterargument to the common belief that human affliction and agony are exclusively personal encounters. Instead, it proposes an alternative viewpoint that implies such unfavorable occurrences function as a pathway for humans to gain access to paradise. Additionally, it challenges the concept that all Christians are entirely redeemed and recognized as priests and rulers by Christ, which originates from an egocentric interpretation of the gospel. Nevertheless, it is vital to recognize the relevance of the Old Testament in this discourse.The notion of fearing God entails viewing the world as comprising diverse manifestations of evil. This viewpoint does not principally advocate for sanguine notions or a conviction in the innate imperfections of humanity. Rather, it underscores the necessity of facing the totality of immorality in society and its impact on individuals' encounters with misconduct, as demonstrated in the Old Testament.This viewpoint enables us to identify the genuine requirements and characteristics of existence, including both positive and negative elements. Nevertheless, the concept of submitting oneself entirely to the goodness of a benelovent Father does not adequately acknowledge the degree of wickedness and sinister schemes that are comparable to the evil that originates from within individuals' hearts.