The concept of evil is subjective since individuals have their own interpretations of what constitutes evil. It is common for humans to downplay their own evil actions while condemning those of others. People may also rationalize or downplay the negative consequences of their actions that result in certain evils that are advantageous to them. The definition of evil is greatly impacted by cultural context, and it is not possible to claim complete adherence to morality, considering that some of the things we enjoy may have been acquired at the expense of someone else's mistreatment or misfortune.It is uncertain whether a comprehensive comprehension of justice can be achieved, as we are not only influenced by a culture that harbors immoral practices, but also possess inherent biases embedded within our understanding of immorality.To approach the topic of evil, it is important to recognize that our limited comprehension of its complete context renders it somewhat impersonal to us. This disparity in perspective between human beings and God is a key factor in how we perceive evil.The notion of God's omniscience, which endows Him with the capacity to detect wickedness in human cognition from the dawn of time to its conclusion, evokes skepticism concerning the plausibility of placing faith in His capability to rectify unfairness when confronted with such malevolence. In spite of the conspicuous dearth of justice, can we rely on God's ultimate reinstatement of equilibrium?The response of God towards evil has sparked extensive discourse within academic and theological circles, owing to its complex and perplexing nature. Despite the general perception of God as benevolent and just, the presence of evil without any discernible response from God poses a significant challenge. Our understanding of ourselves is intertwined with our comprehension of God, and disregarding evil would be deemed contrary to divine principles. The difficulty lies in comprehending God's reaction to evil, as there is often a belief in a timely response from God.There is a common assumption that God is not occupied with other concerns, which leads to the question of whether God's discretion in dealing with evil means that we should not be overly concerned about His failure to respond in the manner we anticipate. The central concern is our limited understanding of the essence of evil, which hinders our ability to grasp how God, in His flawless wrath and justice, possesses the freedom to react to evil in a way that engenders trust in His righteous ways.The central argument of this thesis is that God's intervention is characterized by promptness and fairness, and that it is executed with precision and significant effects. The notion of divine justice is illustrated through the use of the concept of a curse, which serves as a definitive judgment against wrongdoing that is not constrained by time. Given God's eternal nature and comprehensive understanding of all aspects of existence, it is crucial to acknowledge that the curse also possesses an enduring quality.The comprehensive comprehension of the retributive dimension of God's curse remains incompletely determined and presents a more challenging endeavor when compared to other endeavors to delineate sin in a just manner. Due to the inscrutability of God's justice, we can trust in His response to evil to guarantee eternal security.