The aforementioned person is proposing a compromise that involves accepting a contradiction. It is widely accepted that there are no entirely novel ideas in existence. If this individual were to devote more time to reading and analyzing the particulars, they would understand that the TULIP formation follows a logical sequence. Nonetheless, it appears that this person is unwilling to entertain the only other alternative to TULIP, which is the 5 points articulated by Arminius. Engaging in a rational dialogue with someone who subscribes to both conflicting perspectives and regards them as self-evident is challenging.The prevailing viewpoint suggests that the genuineness of the Tulip doctrine is rooted in the limitations inherent in the human will. Given its transient nature, the human will is deemed untrustworthy and frequently in conflict with God's will, leading to actions that are injurious to oneself. To forestall individuals from causing harm to themselves as a result of their own volition, it is posited that divine salvation is the sole remedy, necessitating the suppression of the human will and its full replacement with God's will. This is carried out to preclude any sense of self-congratulation regarding human capabilities.The idea that the capacity of human beings undermines the authority of God is without basis. In fact, it is imperative that God suppresses any human beliefs in order to be recognized as the creator and director of the ultimate purpose of everything. Suggesting that human ability has an equal impact on this matter is incorrect. The sustainability of everything is solely dependent on the will of God. Human weakness makes it impossible to achieve positive transformation without divine salvation to counteract the corruption that exists in the universe. The essentiality of our hope is grounded in its origin from a divine source.If the proposition that God is not the exclusive determinant of events is valid, then it may have implications for the veracity of certain statements attributed to God. Specifically, God has proclaimed Himself as the ultimate authority over all happenings and emphasized that His actions are governed by His own volition. Nevertheless, if such affirmations are contingent upon certain factors or constraints, it is imperative to examine the reliability of God's pronouncements.It is of utmost importance to refer to the explicit teachings of God instead of depending on human interpretations. Trusting human interpretations can lead to disappointment. However, if we solely rely on God's teachings, we can have faith in His invulnerability as there is no obstacle that can hinder His potential to fulfill His commitments. By putting our reliance on God, we are consigning ourselves to a divine Trinity who is incapable of defeat.