An alternative method of critiquing Arminian theology will be employed, wherein a query will be posed and subsequently addressed from both a Calvinistic and a Pauline perspective. Specifically, the inquiry pertains to the respective roles of God and humans - are they autonomous entities? - and the nature of their work.The Arminian mindset encompasses covert insinuations that suggest God solely acts in accordance with human volition, and that God awaits human action before responding. This raises inquiries such as whether God solely operates in accordance with human will, and whether He waits for humans to act before taking action.The incorporation of biblical language and narratives in Arminian discussions prompts inquiries regarding the consequences of their doctrine. This vagueness contributes to the contemporary emphasis on salvation that prioritizes individualism, diverging from Calvinist ideals. However, Calvinists who voice their apprehensions are often met with disapproval for being unworkable and excessively intricate. The fundamental aspect of Calvinist belief is that God is the ultimate agent in salvation, and humans also have a role to play. The initial gift of grace is indispensable to the process as our actions are reliant on it.The efficacy of grace is not subject to human manipulation, but it can motivate human volition. Consequently, the involvement of both divine and human agents is pivotal in achieving virtuous deeds. In the absence of divine intervention, human endeavors are ineffectual. Camouflaging human endeavor within preaching may generate theological ambiguity, culminating in the inference that insufficient labor has been undertaken and that God is anticipating further action from humans. Acknowledging the importance of divine involvement in every facet of virtuous deeds can prevent such confusion.