The subject at hand pertains to an individual's perspective on the concept of free will. If we define will as the capacity to choose between moral good and evil, then a state of equilibrium where both options hold equal importance would render the notion of will meaningless. Will implies a preference for one option over another. Your argument proposes that the will is accountable for and the initiator of its own actions, creating a logical contradiction. Within your theological framework, there appears to be no underlying rationale or justification for the use of will. Without a cause, it could be argued that there is no existence whatsoever.The argument presented suggests that individuals possess the ability to exercise their own autonomy in making choices, indicating a self-determined choice. However, it is challenging to comprehend how the will can determine its own choices without any external factors influencing it. If the will is simply opting for freedom without a valid reason, then this perspective on freedom cannot be considered genuine. The will must have a reason for preferring one option over another, and if we trace back to the initial decision, we must question what influenced that first choice. Ultimately, this leads us to conclude that the will's choices have no cause, and therefore, the concept of self-determined freedom lacks credibility.The relationship between the concepts of existence and freedom is intricate. The belief that we can control our own fate is essentially a belief in the absence of existence. Prior to our existence, we did not exist, but our choices bring us into existence. However, if there is no reason or cause for our choices, then the presence of a higher authority, such as God, is unnecessary. As a result, if God is either non-existent or exists only as a theoretical concept, it is plausible that we will only truly exist in the future, when we are reunited with God, who embodies the concept of existence.Scholars widely acknowledge that an individual's perception of faith is subject to chance, as people possess the capacity to make decisions based on their own rationalizations. Phenomena that cannot be elucidated through logic are commonly classified as matters of faith. Despite acknowledging that faith is rooted in grace, individuals often presume that their volition is objective and impartial, prompting them to prioritize practicality in their reasoning. Consequently, anything that lies beyond the purview of the rational thought process is construed as being contingent on chance, thus indicating a deterministic outlook.