There is a wide divide between those who believe in free will based on libertarian principles and those who believe that the truth is determined by God. I don't want to abandon our beliefs because I have been discussing this topic for a while. If only their contrariness were the only thing taken into account, we would assume that they could abide by the law on their own. In that case, their decency would be irrelevant. Based on this evidence, we must assume that the contradictions of these people hinder the will of God. If we assume that God's intention is to "impose impossible requirements and limit those who can stand before precise standards," then it is clear that he is a powerful and demanding God. I believe that if we continue to value things without regard to their eternal consequences, we will create a world where no one can freely follow the principles of righteousness. No one can confidently say that they have done everything they can to please God before, since doing so would mean admitting their sins have interfered with His righteous standards. If God is really just, then He will not be pleased with anyone who tries to please Him based on their own efforts, rather than relying on His help. If the Gentiles had not tried to choose God and bargained brutally with the assessment of "flagellation for skin", they would be in a worse position than we are now. At the very least, the heathens refuse to follow the ethical guidelines set by the gospel and instead pursue their own desires. The legal validity of a heathen is that they do not understand the existence of God. There is a lack of sincerity in their efforts to look to sacred scripture and evaluate God, as if there was no real attraction to Him if one cannot verify this spiritual appetite. The couple appeared to be living selfishly, disregarding the needs of others. Some people with a Judging Personality might claim their righteousness by appealing to their own natural desire to find God.Others might do so by relying on their personal values and experiences. Others may authenticate their righteousness by meeting the expectations of others. It's not just rational blindness, it's evil. Clearly, these law-abiding individuals are different from those who naturally seek God out. Those who have no logical reason to do so are at a disadvantage.The Bible teaches that one must have a sincere desire to seek God out in order to be successful. This gospel teachings condemn mortals and other beings as being unworthy of salvation. If God were to appreciate anyone for their sins, who would be able to give them an accurate grade? The fundamental change is that saints have a lasting appeal to assess, as God knows, he can not stand the ethics of the unbeliever, while the unbeliever does not authentically care about God. What factual comparisons can be made between God and humans in regards to their adherence to a set of moral standards? Who instills this value in us before God? If we come to the conclusion that we cannot agree with the ethics of God, then only those who understand instinctively are ethical before God. How can we be righteous and still sin?Because we live our lives according to the principles of ethical Christianity, we are able to have a rich, full life. Many people who know they are righteous in Christ try to figure out difficult ethical principles for themselves, knowing that God's assessment is that if He ever decided to judge the world, all evil would disappear by the curse. If God doesn't tolerate sin or wickedness, what would He say if we ever came to see Him?But as believers in Christ, we can't be cursed by Him because He came to Earth as an eternal curse for us. If we want to avoid God's judgment, we need to accept Him completely. In God's world, things tend to work out according to plan. It is always "cut straight". It is eternal life or death. He cannot allow sin with true joy. It's an oxymoron.