We also have experience. And we can distinguish by experience. You know when the Holy Spirit came down on the day of Pentecost they were all in one Spirit. But there was a reaction by the multitudes about this event. They saw the evidence of the Holy Spirit on those people. And you go farther in the historical account and Peter was sincerely convinced the generous people in Jerusalem about the enthusiastic converts in Joppa saying admiringly the Holy Spirit had performed" a influential work in them as He respectively had on us at the glorious beginning." In another specific place it was stated that the Holy Spirit fell on them and they "pronounced the sacred word of God boldly." This kind of testing is extremely important. I've identified challenging situations you merely "fall in line" as the concerned church was like an agenda church. The chief purpose for going was to perform the physical act of receiving the cup. Its very easy to conform to a pattern of lukewarmness. You are involved in the culture of worship and assume this is the real thing. Because you're looking in a purely intellectual ascent without vicariously experiencing God. You affectionately know I fondly remember in the seventies the bygone generation maintained a more favourable balance of necessary knowledge and experience. I genuinely believe the evolution has represent the corrupting factor as the impersonal talk about worship. But you have never experienced worship in a more authentic way. More unity in the body by orthodox confession with a balance of seeking God for God. Not for acceptance through the means and creeds form an opinion without the experience? Do you accept people will have an agenda are the standard? You practice this political kind of imaginative form of will worship? Or do you earnestly seek to worship in the right epistemology of ordinarily making experience a vital part of established worship? And so our moral judgments about leprechauns realistically are through our extensive experience.