Psalm seventy-three 25 "Whom have I in heaven but you? And the earth has nothing that I need but you." after we are reliably delivered, we will soon enter the eternal kingdom of God. Our old can, with its rebellious message of the unfortunate expression of our desperate desire, is soon destroyed, and our new will, which gracefully communicates according to God's Word, is sufficiently established. The old desires were not only corrupted but cursed.The new wishes by Divine Grace. We often describe eternal salvation as if one half of our political temperament is desperately fighting the other half. In we would conclude that our choice was achieved by two equal desires, one for choice and one against choice, occurring simultaneously within the same relationship. These can be two-line theology. That may be a political contradiction. Once we are liberated, we tend to stop representing ourselves and instead be drawn to the name of God. Instead of Scripture balancing truth into classes and dividing the soul into numerous organisms, it seeks to unite the whole human being through the kingdom we represent and not through the way our souls function. This may be why there is a certain reversal of our desires as we move from the realm of darkness to the realm of light. We tend to enter into a renewed relationship with the eternal kingdom in such a way that our corrupt desires are stabilized by the extraordinary power of God. These new desires are intuitively opposed to us because of our ethical corruption. That is what the apostle meant when he said, It is not I who do it, but sin that dwells in me.“Consequently, there are enough reasons for us to assent to the mysterious kingdom of God. The explanation that salvation triumphs in this way is based on God's will, which cannot be frustrated. This may be why our disobedience is "open." He then had to compel obedience, of course, the grudging acceptance of the people would compellingly plan our obedience, but God rightly advises royal liberty by divine grace. Our true freedom to sin, even for pleasure, is the primary reason for choosing, not forcing. Various political figures simply teach that God sets us free and reluctantly produces a substitute will, which inevitably can result in slavish obedience. Therefore, God does not force us to conform quickly, but we must obey as an immediate result. God's strength usually keeps us from disobedience. This can be a direct contradiction. That can be 2-line theology. This lesson remains why we don't earn the respect of the best of the world. We tend to constantly teach that carefree grace does not adequately represent all the political gifts we receive after passing through the fragile door of salvation, but that same grace does not apply when tested because of the uncertain future violently crashes into the present. This thought is the ultimate contradiction. It's like saying I'm not mad that you just created a veiled threat to me because I maliciously maintain a separate area that I reserve for all political disagreements. This uncomfortable space simply represents my impersonal relationship to political salvation. It's like saying, "When I conquer my excessive desires, I hate myself."“But we tend to consciously ask for eternal salvation when we are released to be really happy with it. If we tend not to belong in God's eternal kingdom, we sincerely ask as if we do belong until we know for sure.”
No comments:
Post a Comment