Mans appreciation of sin and the necessary consequences is born from a sinful perspective. Thus, we live in a society in which the lawful structure of God's conscience is undergoing a detailed restructuring. This is a long and detailed digression about my critical opinion of this particular article. I have many issues with it, and would like to share some of them with you. This is why man naturally regards advantageous evil and evil conscionable: it is through his moral constitution. The commonsensical decline out isn't explicitly declining God's social morals, but instead trying to gradually eliminate God by redefining Him. Each man was frustrated with the feeling that he was ignorant and the other man was in control. Through self-assertion, men changed God's law to protect themselves aggressively and take what rightfully belonged to God for themselves. Therefore, I don't think we will inevitably prove conscientious chastity because the bureaucracy of a degenerate society is upside down. It only reinforces our false assumptions. There is only one choice: either chastity is a moral good, or it is a cursed evil. No matter what the consequences may be. What would be the consequences of chastity being granted to some saints and not others? How would He communicate this to those who are burdened by sorrow? How does God change the social laws that could credibly threaten His definite purposes to protect His innocent people? He alters them so that they work together harmoniously in support of His people. This is the mystery that continues to be beautiful.