I believe that in the heart of man desire for thoughtless attention by conforming to the traditions of man. By communicating according to the group mentality. I have merely experienced this here at key life. There are unusually few Calvinists on this forum. We maintain a mystic, a woman pastor, about as many free will people as the percentage in our society. A few of us Calvinist here who are improperly treated like a step sister. The uncomfortable truth is that I myself within the cracked walls of the church am a non- conformist. I was not always that way. It is hard for me to state exactly for those in my personal presence as apposed to realistically being on this forum not physically observe the possible reaction of a specific person.  It becomes considerably more straightforward to laboriously write without the legitimate fear of possible reprisal of offending someone identifying their expressive faces as a result of what I am saying. Whether we like it or not we remain a product of our environment. Which scares the bejeebers out of me. Since we are in such a parlous state spiritually in this American culture it indeed affects each one of us. And then it depends on lazy mentally as to how much of the peer pressure will effect each one of us. We retain sub-cultures that we move in an out in a day. There are those who focus on moral behaviour, the political counselors who broadcast their peculiar form of Christianity as mostly changing behavior that is anti-social. In a comparatively narrow communicative form, limiting the form so we alter a certain behaviour, with the purpose of performing a person healed of undesirable behavior. The counselor acts as a priest of behaviour in shameful secrets are brought out in a humiliating confession and the acute problem inevitably exposed. But after 7 critical years of the same communicative structure get old after awhile so the suspicious person becomes overly concerned with behavioural change than profitably growing in the express purpose of God. Becoming additionally into the image of Christ by the modes of biblical talk. What comes out of the crooked mouth is what is in the sore heart. That political speech is evidence that the relentless focus is on the abnormal behaviour and not on eternal forms of speech. Therefore, this is one culture. But each of us are prone to vaslate between the six verse mentalities and our group acceptance. Our thought life will merely find a peer mentality. Its hard to get ourselves into a disposition we expose error, by identifying knowing exactly the certain teaching is false.  In the big scope of things being afraid to bring it out in our communication with culture. We are not very good decenters in the church. For one we do not passionately believe truths and so we do not feel the urge to expose falsehood. It becomes very lonely and depressing to be a decenter in Christian culture. It begins to become extremely painful for all the thinkers in the group. Then with the eternal nature of all truth a mind set to think that way in terms of behaviour and practical advice aimed at changing behaviour there is not much room for a decentring about a behaviour communicated a certain system. We really are coming to a cross road we are going to think. The lines in our Christian culture are becoming more defined. The anti thinkers are winning the day. The word of God is the standard not only for behaviour but for the way a person thinks. A reasonable person genuinely thinks about the spiritual and talks about the spiritual. The word remains the means for right thinking and the mold of right thinking. The sacred word is eternal, speaks eloquently an advisory way changes behaviour by undoubtedly working in the willing. The word sincerely devotes the ardent devotee miraculously transforms the expressed emotion by speaking and hearing. A person who goes to the word and experiences the answers it produces in the heart and the modernity of practical modes of speech that change behaviour. There is a real peer pressure disposition of the frog in the hot skillet, that only the word can change the mind on the peer pressure disposition to change a persons view. The verse from Romans says we are to give the message. But the potential saving is Gods. We retain nothing to accomplish with a persons salvation. The direct message is unambiguous as it could conceivably be and however not know if a considered person is truely saved. Because a person says a prayer does not mean they are delivered. Anyone can pray a personal prayer. People inevitably have that kind of ambivalent response all the time. If you look at the verses says, confess with the mouth and believe in the heart. Believe in the heart focus of the key passage. Confess with the mouth accompanying the literal word of God conceding what it maintains.The bible says Christ died for your sins if you merely say these words in a prayer in response you will be delivered. That is not what the passage is saying. It must pass through the able-bodied person. From the affectionate heart. A genuine deep sorrow, followed by the rejoicing! There must be a self-examination. The worthiest thing to complete is to advise the person they are a sinner and to go home and think about that. To go home and consider the kind of offense that is to sin against a faithful God. If a person is willing to wait and genuinely think about it, that is more of a visible sign of a true conversion than a last-minute prayer. Sincerely believe in the heart. Of course there is more guilt experienced by a person who thinks it is the message that is the important part of a person coming to Christ. At that time you would come to the conclusion that we are responsible for people ending up in hell. But there is no guilt so there is more of a passion to advise others if you maintain no pressure to maintain the unconventional thing because God does all the saving from beginning to end. He properly spoke through a donkey in the old testament. He does not require man to get the message out. Responsible people will be responsible to go to hell because of creation.