The question of Christian penitence in the literal tutoring through the preaching of the word provides the circumstance of regeneration or the implantation of the law of God. We educate that sermonizing law cons the wrongdoer who's given new life in which follows concession of sin and penitence. But the Psalmist describes the regeneration in the farther environment of the curse of the law. He duly describes the spiritually eyeless wrongdoer as dead. The legal king precisely explains that God cursed humanity after the first sin was deliberately committed in the private garden. Not simply was sin passed onto the mortal race but the eternal curse sufficiently established the essential foundation of spiritual and fleshly death. Because the deplorable condition is more shocking than being born bad with particular sin, the critical station of God in the curse is far worse than simply offering deliverance as a peculiar gift. Theologians simply educate the universal sin in the political environment of "common grace". I unfeignedly believe the eternal curse of the law shortly describes a more severe condition than" common grace." Rather of Gods wrathfulness being direct rejection and silence, God declares authoritative pronouncements of the fierce curse against the wicked. The condescending station of God isn't an offer but a coarse command or be cursed in burning hell. How do we establish a universal call to eternal deliverance if God divinely reveals an aggressive station of grim hostility to the wicked? If God divinely reveals wrathfulness in defense of His creation, why are we simply describing the deliverance as offer? We nicely conclude from God being hostile to the wicked that He's defensive of the rebuttable presumption of the offer. Presuming that God is illegal if He roughly condemns without an offer. Presuming that God simply relates to wicked in the same way we functionally relate to the ideal world. Another logical reason God initiates hostility is because of the peril of simply landing His top seat of moral judgement. However, it would really encourage our social practice of innocent acceptance being abused as compelling reason to instantly replace Gods independent judgement, If God didn't present a capital charge to the wicked committing capital crimes. But because God is really justified wrathfulness and wrathful in cursing the wicked, will help us from rightly developing a realistic culture where man inescapably becomes the critical judge. The terrible curse designedly strikes our abiding sense of presiding justice. Another logical reason is the saints warrant of sincere conviction of the completed work of Christ as the satisfactory cover. If all sin demands the eternal curse there's no other option to adequately deal with sin and moral weakness. Humanly insolvable for a wrongdoer to miraculously escape the direct consequences of his sin by rejuvenating himself. These along with numerous further logical arguments changes the accessible way we suppose about Christian penitence as if privately relates to the pronounced curse.