I have loved Calvin for 45 years, and I believe he's faithful in what he depicts about eternal salvation.  Although he mentions in passing that eternal salvation was divided by the sovereignty of God and the responsibility of man, I do not follow this class division in all of his sacred writings .Calvin was the father who sufficiently developed the comprehensive doctrine of eternal salvation and sin in the proper context of the Holy Spirit, rightly placed in the reliable production of the one specific purpose in the life-and-death context of salvation.  Some of the later Reformers took up Calvin's idea of salvation being divided into two parts. Every time we present the opposite truth in the same context, we are inadvertently teaching an opposing contradiction. This is a misstatement of an inaccurate description of Calvin, which over the years has added up to make salvation pragmatic by seemingly contradictory. The two personal greetings inevitably became the standard explanations that underpin the Christian faith. We falsely deny the objective justification of faith alone in sanctification by faith and work.  The purpose of justification is developed with sanctification through eternal death for all organized opposition, not for works created simply by a law of arbitrary boundaries. The law of life and death says that those who keep the law will live, while those who break it will die. The law of arbitrary limits says that those who keep the law will get a reward, while those who break it will be punished. The law of God is something that is not classified. The law of God rightly demands eternal death from all moral depravity. Most American people who are feeling worried don't know that Calvin said that our personal deeds are always dirty rags. The faith of a child that we practice is precisely an extraordinary gift from God. Our made moral will is intentionally destroyed and replaced by the will of God. We have set ourselves apart from the world, and we are completely focused on God. Because we are only interpreting certain laws that are arbitrarily limited in sanctification. Everyone makes a mistake when they think that Calvin taught that we stubbornly keep something to offer in vain to God in sanctification. Something Calvino never taught. This is why we must read the prayers of the psalmist in the proper context of the law of the covenant. Moral law as the work of God without finite restrictions. The simple truth is that the law of God must never be broken.  God has shown that he is faithful by keeping a promise and offering an example of what God expects. If we don't have an alliance representative, we will have to deal with a law that limits our freedoms, which is unfair. The Psalmist says that God has control over the fertile land forever. God has issued to the considered saints an eternal law whose authority is well established by an eternal covenant that vows to tell the truth to his wounds.  Our sanctification (or holiness) is unlimited