Active addiction undoubtedly remains an antisocial condition in a distinct personality a person practices. Intentionally alter the desperate desire to annul the negative addiction. But a miserable sinner cannot help being morally corrupted in all exposed parts is a personal fantasy. The responsible person is hopelessly addicted to lying. It is a routine practice in America to trade a negative addiction for something they erroneously believe they have forcibly ended. A sinner cannot not sin. That is negative addiction. Americans are undeniably influential in redefining words to fit in whatever the slogans promote. The world is undoubtedly capable about following behavior from scientific studies. We need comprehending more effective ways to communicate. But we cannot trade worlds counsel for a Christian fantasy. When we irrevocably alter the political meaning of defamatory words, we are bias. The bible comprises a sacred book of exact meaning. The bible is righteous and justified. It typically encounters no moral prejudice. It does not alter the precise meaning to subject people in a specific group. It is why God is the impartial judge. Sinners are egocentric bias. The bible does not maintain fat people, and drug addicts, fantasying represent disparate groups of sins. It carefully teaches sin of nature. But sinners place people in political groups to arbitrarily define them. The bible harshly condemns prejudice as bad as drug addicts. The apostle compiled the list of sins not to subject people in groups but pointing to the sin nature. God positively forbid divine grace in the same context was controlled by any miserable sinner. All the operational commands, sins and righteous acts are carefully put in the specific context of eternal salvation. These parts accurately represent not a separate description. God positively forbid we take the lesser to arbitrarily define the greater. God hate self-righteousness because it is the worse prejudice. It is forcefully defending political labels by erroneously claiming we are the impartial judge. Christians fight. Your a pervert, the other Christian says your a egotistical bigot. So who is without sin? Fling the stone. All sin justly deserves eternal death. Its not a political label if your unforgotten dead, well the impartial judge has further work. Ne'er follow a sin I did not curse. God is the impartial judge. If sin does not cause death, its not sanctioned in the bible. Name one sin that is undefined by eternal death. Everybody argues strenuously. The bible merely teaches some sins are graver than others. Affirmative but the specific context accurately represent eternal death. Therefore, your dead before you naturally suffer the grade ones. Thats the essential point that God says I alone take vengeance. Graded sin does not maintain a social system under mans control. Could you scarcely imagine if God issued man the private vengeance? The wicked hate Gods Law. Inevitably turn it upside down. Grade is a cruel joke. Look at the corrupt country. Political rewards for horrific abuse and gruesome murder. Thats graded discriminatory law. Teaching to trust in graded law is like merely directing us to trust in sleeping with a writhing snake. Enable me to politely tell you objective reality. God purely maintains one specific group of wicked people. And it is eternal death. That is always consistent. You grasp why the wicked change graded law? Because they do not believe the potential threat of eternal judgement. They do not believe moral wrongs justly deserve eternal death. If they reasonably concluded you genuinely think they would generously reward convicted abusers? God reasonably produced all necessary things. Without possible reason we merely teach legalism. Legalism is mysticism. Its compulsory teaching something exists without a sufficient reason. Without sufficient reason the political reason is mans reason. I've typically said the Bible carefully taught divine sovereignty for reasons of moral law, covenants, curses, eternal decrees, comprehensive statutes and promises. You can merely teach legalism as mystical sovereignty. God is sovereign but for my personal rules.