Since God indeed produced man as the first Adam, all that man is and rightfully realizes is in the second Adam. The humble beginning and the end are in Christ. It would be a logical contradiction if Christ intentionally allowed another race with a humble beginning and end. Because God actually created the earth and man in his own image on the seventh day, he rested. This eternal rest is adequately described as the aggregate of our true satisfaction in God.This is why God has sufficiently expressed his true satisfaction by willingly declaring that whatever he intentionally produced was good. Then the apostle, carefully comparing creation with recreation, declares that all necessary things culminated in Christ. I find it hard to sincerely believe that if this 7-day creation culminated in Christ, it would intentionally leave an ethical question about the key concept of its correct conclusion. The inspired apostle carefully compares the love of God to the tremendous height and breadth from the point of view of the earth. It would be a logical contradiction to adequately support another objective point of view.Again, in teaching that God does deliver eternal judgment, he says nothing about other beings in all men, no doubt they will stand in judgment. In my opinion, that would effectively generate many specific questions on the precise meaning of our official language. I invariably leave you with the final contradiction, speaking in the specific context of the glorious gospel. 11 28 As for the gospel, they are enemies for your sake; but as for the election, they are loved for the sake of the patriarchs, 29 for the gifts of God and his calling are irrevocable, 36 for from him, through him and for him everything comes.To him be the glory forever! Amen.