These guys play quickly and easily with the pronouns in the text. He says that when the apostle points to a broken relationship in the past, it is all-encompassing to group members of the local church together by the distinction he makes between you and them, but he is quick and easy to play on this very important matter Separation from those in whom they are. If Paul gives a very detailed description in describing the saving relationship of a group, then why is he pointing to this teaching that Paul makes on the saving relationship and not accepting the full description of his use of the personal pronouns you, we, we, etc. does not conform to the rules of grammar. Given all the covenant promises and fully justified, then where is this other group of people in the text who are reconciled but not saved?How does the apostle differentiate when he speaks only of us and of them? Where is that third group? It's just in your head.
As I have shown, by making a quick rule that the "world" is everyone who lives on earth, He creates many contradictions in the text. He says he believes in the context of these verses but refuses to allow a very legitimate definition that it is our responsibility to interpret the text accurately. There are other definitions of "world" that are more consistent with the text, as I pointed out.