Woe, he got the idea that God takes vengeance on the wicked! We accept the pledge that the wicked will catch on the righteous, but God watches over them and will retaliate the poor. The whole conception of a curse is grounded on the idea that the damned don't believe that God testifies against them. Thus, they do wrong to their neighbors with immunity. The satisfactory answer to your will is that God will take vengeance in due course. In this way the moral law curses the wicked. When Israel entered the law, they had to intimately assent to observe, but they secured the pledge of grace to cover the breach of the law and replied that they would fulfill the law by the power of God.. And I also had to say that curses fall on anyone who breaks these laws, so godly revenge was an critical need. Psalm 3210 Numerous are the curses of the wicked, but the LORD’s unerring love surrounds the one who trusts in him. Woe and curses are exchangeable words. Many are the curses of the wicked.
Isaiah 311They couldn't take vengeance on the wicked; only in a war situation could they discipline their enemies? But the law has no power if there are no curses. Then's a living picture When Moses descended after publicizing the moral law, reasonable people had erected a pagan hero; at that moment God wanted to abolish them; But Moses defended the people. The cons had a choice. They freed themselves from their pagan hero and warmly accepted the specific vittles of the moral law by stepping away. pagan icons. Also they grouped on either side. They killed those who were with the icons. His compatriots. His own family, etc. This is the picture Jesus spoke of when he said they could not put anyone in front of him and he refocused out the preaching of the law. As a result, they were faced with New Testament Judaism, which Jesus meant, and their family considered them dead.