The particular problem with Lewis's flimsy argument is that God can only exist because we only possess righteousness, justice, and so on. Righteousness. Did he get a moral judgment, but a thorough understanding of all historical facts enables him to judge accurately and without prejudice? If there is no eternal curse for all sins, God will not participate in divine retribution on the created earth. For the sake of fairness, by empowering us to be omnipresent, omnipotent, and omniscient, so that our claims are not hypocritical to prove the existence of God? Just to be a good man, Lewis inevitably became a true Pharisee. As the highest attitude towards fair judgments, it is logical that we take moral judgments from our fragile hands and place them in safe hands. Declared to the slightest depravity not by authoritative eternal death, God will never be able to determine all things in his eternal will. If there is no eternal curse for all sins, God will not participate in divine retribution on the created earth. Marked by blessings and curses, the love of God may abuse its clear intentions. God just represents a universal God who has no clear choice.This will definitely give Lewis sovereignty.