They are extremely intelligent people. They confer on us social status outside the general relationships, and use quick rules to intentionally create unique categories as we strive to conveniently divide exposed people into political personalities and merely make them political part of a healthy, overall society. We note them as if we have to deal with them. We have to reluctantly agree with God's political prejudices. If there is some pervasive disorder in these political components, the entire paradigm will be inadvertently violated.Perverse creatures should scarcely regard them with God's critical eyes. This is why we rarely encounter political problems. In the present climate we no longer try following God’s absolute statement to adequately establish an active connection. If we want to genuinely enjoy the essential oneness of all necessary things, we must carefully follow who God is and who we are, but if God is absolutely unknown, we are eliminated, and if we are absolutely unfamiliar in indulgence, God is eliminated.We display a social attribute. We reasonably conclude this is his empirical evidence because God reliably produced us for Himself. Therefore, to be independent, we must accurately indicate how God expresses Himself.

 If God is completely unknown, we cannot properly appreciate his direct manifestation of ourselves; if we are completely unfamiliar, we will not recognize ourselves. If we genuinely want to express ourselves in a sacred way, we must be capable to do so alone. When our self-knowledge is accurately determined in God, we must adequately express our will as God expresses His. This is why I no longer pay specific attention to worm theology. Worm’s theology is based merely on the fact that through his incarnation, Christ has justly entrusted him with moral responsibility for everything. Through his faithful obedience and completed work on the cross, we are destined to gratefully accept everything in Christ. However, if we do not yet fully know Christ, we will not repeat what God said when he produced us. Are we the kings and priests of our earthly status, or do we hope that different people will merely complete us? Are we ruling now, or really a significant part of the body of Christ to the whole?If we are truly one and God is the King of the universe, why should he not let us control creation? In my opinion, we have at present secured our inheritance. When expressing our kingship, we express how we were produced.

 If the Old Testament instructs us to be kings and priests of the Most High, why can we describe this teaching as retrogression while being promised all the future inheritance? I genuinely think we already have everything. "However, we have promised that we will no longer need to overcome all obstacles. In my humble opinion, we are constantly becoming the exact identity carefully taught in the Old Testament. If we are now kings and priests, this changes justice and judicial fairness. The comprehensive form graciously allows us to sufficiently express ourselves.