If Adams' attitude to the law is outdated, then there is no law. This is a matter of personal preference. I think people respond naturally to the illegal application of the law. If we do not accept God's qualification standards, we will not develop understanding. The empirical evidence that Christ is with us in the laws of the promises of grace, curses, divine decrees, and the general covenant. These moral axioms and eternal covenants are realized through God's goodness, Fatherly kindness and loyalty. And divine grace. In view of the law, it is clear that we need a substitute, otherwise we will be hopeless. 

The related question is, how do we assimilate the substitute work of Christ so that we can recognize his grace when we are in fellowship with him? We must carefully comply with regulatory requirements through mutual agreement. Therefore, the definite substitution is rooted in God's goodness, faithfulness, goodness, and grace, not in us.Of course, to some extent, the description of God elevates the law to a higher level, because this is the basic principle of his faithfulness and so on. This is our unwavering trust in our faith, because he faithfully upholds the law through his holiness. As the most wonderful understanding of law, we can be sure that it is an accurate Substitute. 

During the implementation of the standard, we were unable to fulfill part of our agreement. God’s anger towards lawbreakers needs a satisfactory substitute for our breach of contract. Therefore, our anger towards God has moved away from our mutual trust firmly based on his commitment to be loyal and uphold his infinite standards of moral justice. We can trust his promise because we know he will not make mistakes. I think this is how we did it. As we increase our faith in the gospel, let us look at the law. So far, we have known that we are responsible because we thought of this logical idea.