Allow me write about the divine necessity to gently persuade this spiritual man faithfully described according to my dogmatic Calvinist position. Hence, all Christian endeavors in this moral world to do good to our fellow man is to be heartily commended to the objective truth according to the social value of the charitable work. But I cringe when my Calvinist brothers become kind of moderate. Because objective truth is succinctly defined as one divine precept upon another in necessary unity of one. We are sufficiently instructed the awakened soul of man receives necessary sustenance from the objective truth like eating at well furnished table. Consequently, all of these spiritual foods that we fittingly describe are like the ripe fruit of the productive vine graciously communicated in our common experience of becoming more animated by the effect. This is why I so dislike Greek thinking, because it redefines the historical concepts of the Hebrew motif. It revises the consistent definition of the apostles encouragement to relentlessly follow his unusual pattern.

 Paul did not merely receive the raw revelation who was the apostle who came out of eternal heaven to accurately deliver the divine message. But the inspired apostle was clearly instructing the divine truth he gleaned from the ot sacred writings about eternal salvation. Instead of conveniently dividing these two hermeneutic views we are inseparably uniting the ot divine revelation with the nt. The bible is detailed in adequately describing the corporeal world. It invariably goes beyond saying that the sacred promises and commands make up the harmonious whole of the bible. But the words are united in one a description of the whole book. Instead, the bible encourages a creative way to deal with heart issues. It actually uncovers the historic beginnings working like a tool that goes down to the depths of mans soul. Consequently, we do not order our specific words for the specific purpose of sounding like Greek minded nt modern theologians but we graciously allow the ot to provide the historical foundation of the authoritative teaching about man and eternal salvation.

Therefore, this gets to the heart of the issue, because if we divide the christian man into what he thinks and equally define him on what he does then we will be tempted to redefine all of the doctrines and their effects upon the heart of man. If we take away from God and give some to man then all of these descriptions of salvation, sin, judgement, and grace will be changed. This is why I hold my Calvinism to my heart. Because it is more than a set of teachings. It is my experience of God communicating His life in my soul.